monitoring and evaluation system;tragedy of the commons;project design and implementation;cost of service delivery;project monitoring and evaluation;public good;social ...  انظر المزيد + capital;community participation;voice and choice;public service delivery;building social capital;research observer;Public Goods;public sector activity;public works program;construction of facilities;access to water;improved water quality;active community involvement;political economy considerations;food for education;primary care services;water user group;misuse of fund;gap in knowledge;provision of health;impact on participation;opportunities for corruption;management of facility;pure public good;fee for service;redistribution of wealth;quality of participation;quality of public;data on expenditures;propensity score matching;improvements in health;provision of education;private property right;quality and quantity;local collective action;issues of class;multilateral development institution;games of strategy;return to investment;short time horizon;cost of participation;sources of fund;participatory planning exercise;society and culture;concept of participation;social investment fund;household education expenditure;decentralization of power;poverty reduction effort;benefits of participation;community-based development;participatory development;common pool resource;poor household;poor community;targeting performance;Economic Inequality;poverty program;Public Services;local knowledge;local inequality;common knowledge;project sustainability;social system;private benefit;development policy;geographic targeting;better-off household;income inequality;targeting program;empirical work;social scientist;open access;public realm;participatory exercise;local power;marginal input;project effectiveness;external agencies;panel data;land inequality;school autonomy;channel development;workfare program;institutional environment;negative effect;community contribution;voluntary contribution;slum improvement;Irrigation Maintenance;concave function;irrigation scheme;heterogeneity increase;piped water;local management;participatory strategy;educated men;individual incentive;anthropological study;poverty focus;village group;equitable water;beneficiary group;initial distribution;increased inequality;Forest Conservation;qualitative method;multiple dimension;poor attendance;positive correlation;poverty impact;irrigation system;employment outcome;management board;school staff;school effectiveness;exogenous constraint;school service;agricultural input;agricultural output;project reviews;Water Services;economics literature;ethnic polarization;government staff;investment cost;instrumental variable;causal effect;water system;private contractor;informed choice;ethnic diversity;cooperative behavior;academic quality;school quality;parental participation;social sanctions;social divide;material resource;ethnic heterogeneity;ethnic identities;marginal impact;resource distribution;social activities;individual preference;individual characteristic;private good;survey data;sanitation facility;religious identity;social power;beneficiary household;census data;antipoverty program;local participation;community representative;community capacity;cultural context;Temporary Migration;poverty targeting;poor infrastructure;rural area;anecdotal evidence;selection bias;fund investment;program wage;provincial allocation;local accountability;human capital;coordinated action;social construct;social relationship;common good;external network;unequal system;political context;everyday practice;political decentralization;knowledge production;public events;Program of Activities;local relation;detailed planning;operational demands;organic form;administrative boundary;settlement pattern;causal relationship;project quality;qualitative study;government commitment;information problem;civic capacity;power relation;institution building;environmental concern;financial loss;adequate participation;participatory approach  رؤية أقل ـ