loss of ecosystem services;European Bank for Reconstruction;world heritage;protected area;national biodiversity;international financing organizations;Oil & Gas;Oil and ...  انظر المزيد + Gas;impacts on biodiversity;global environmental crisis;resettlement performance;private land;water control structure;interpretation of law;compensation for damage;Public Sector Development;ecosystem biodiversity;access to information;loss of biodiversity;management of habitat;institutional capacity building;risk of cost;assessment of biodiversity;biodiversity impact;natural habitat;biodiversity value;conservation interest;habitat loss;biodiversity loss;Land tenure;mitigation measure;stakeholder engagement;Extractive Industry;Natural Resources;habitat quality;biodiversity damage;legal protection;habitat type;species conservation;conserve biodiversity;cumulative impact;species extinction;water source;precautionary principle;surface area;human population;ecosystem type;habitat restoration;financial sustainability;conservation activity;Wind Power;core principle;conservation tool;water area;offset payments;conservation effort;nutrient cycling;soil formation;forest clearing;Project Monitoring;natural processes;local ngo;price support;benefit sharing;physical distance;public consultation;forced sale;government expropriation;transparent information;land acquisition;primary production;sacred sites;mining company;investment cost;archaeological site;cultural resource;adequate compensation;degraded forests;species richness;risk situations;Population Density;land surface;civil works;mining companies;small area;vegetation distribution;global population;population data;induced impacts;protection status;baseline information;agricultural technique;conservation action;ecosystem conservation;long-term survival;grievance mechanism;political will;port facility;institutional failure;security concern;armed groups;drug cartels;outcome monitoring;sale price;monitoring arrangement;project impact;local infrastructure;small grants;environmental service;management intervention;institutional responsibilities;park infrastructure;geographic location;road agency;skilled personnel;plant material;matching grant;management cost;environmental standard;endangered species;residual damage;population size;scientific data;stakeholder concern;high vulnerability;ecological function;threat level;species composition;water conservation;legal mechanism;staff housing;access road;field equipment;shopping mall;sports complex;rural affairs;conservation targets;protection need;landscape approach;significant threat;budgetary allocation;incentive payment;Public Infrastructure;housing development;forestry plantation;natural dam;oil palm;sugar cane;urban expansion;environmental standpoint;mitigation option;power utilities;power utility;wetland habitat;legal requirement;cut off;agricultural expansion;alternative water;international supply;Environmental Assessment;fresh water;intact ecosystems;natural ecosystem;Electric Power;distribution line;conservation concern;natural hazard;material wealth;ecosystem function;cultural value;native species;incidental take;invasive species;aquatic habitat;plant species;marine ecosystem;conservation status;cultural services;human societies;wild food;financing source;policy requirement;international finance;conservation law;restoration measure;national conservation;management control;project's impact;national status;water right;downstream sites;conservation area;habitat diversity;restricted access;natural vegetation;local law;community support;oil extraction;incidental mortality;acceptable price;grazing land;natural site;biodiversity information;performance requirement;long-term conservation;precautionary approach;land conversion;  رؤية أقل ـ