Skip to Main Navigation

Targeting results, diagnosing the means : innovative approaches for improving public sector delivery (الإنجليزية)

This note sets out approaches to reform which start with identifying the shortcomings in results and which then look for pragmatic solutions that fit the particular context: no best practice, fewer universal recommendations for institutional design. The relative merits of this type of approach have not been empirically tested, but they are nonetheless intuitively reasonable and offer an alternative to other models of institutional reform which have not had great success. This note argues that these results-based approaches are a welcome breath of fresh air in a difficult domain. They are clearly in tune with the current results focus of the international development community and they address many of the challenges recognized by practitioners in previous approaches. However the authors still have remarkably little hard evidence on which to base a robust assessment of the effectiveness of this type of intervention.

تفاصيل

  • المؤلف

    Manning, Nick, Watkins,Joanna Alexandra

  • تاريخ الوثيقة

    2013/05/01

  • نوع الوثيقة

    مذكرة موجزة

  • رقم التقرير

    98815

  • مجلد رقم

    1

  • عدد المجلدات

    1

  • البلد

    العالم,

  • المنطقة

    مناطق العالم,

  • تاريخ الإفصاح

    2015/08/11

  • حالة الافصاح

    Disclosed

  • اسم الوثيقة

    Targeting results, diagnosing the means : innovative approaches for improving public sector delivery

  • كلمة أساسية

    public sector reform;public expenditure on health;corruption perception index;national poverty reduction strategy;monitoring and evaluation tool;public management system;public sector system;Financial Management System;public service reform;international development community;feedback of lessons;Civil Service Reform;service delivery arrangement;management of resources;public sector institution;supply of skill;Political Economy Analysis;skilled human resource;management of health;skilled human capital;level of performance;public service delivery;public management reform;Public Financial Management;quality of policy;civil service remuneration;types of indicator;management infrastructure;management of infrastructure;improved service delivery;budget execution problems;civil service law;management of operation;success and failure;short time horizon;reference source;reform approaches;survival strategy;ratchet effect;delivery problem;annual budget;quantitative targets;quantitative performance;managerial reform;public good;political level;delivery capacity;binding constraint;local actors;governance environment;institutional form;fresh air;professional standard;budget process;performance framework;citizen scorecards;Public Goods;Health Service;professional group;problem-solving approach;Management Systems;response time;threshold effects;performance information;charter school;public concern;urban transport;agency performance;delivery plan;middle class;federal resource;examination result;Performance Standards;detailed planning;acceptable standard;monitoring mechanism;peer learning;Criminal justice;Education Services;empirical evidence;incentive system;budget exercise;upstream processes;political elite;implicit assumption;government power;reading score;state agency;political influence;smaller group;political environment;Health Workers;skilled staff;political support;government priority;performance system;political leadership;system improvement;central unit;public health;policy priority;frequency distribution;risk aversion;open debate;political pressure;political calculation;vested interests;public job;temporary structures;ethnic cleavages;performance ranking;development theory;quantitative indicators;rapid change;monitor performance;solving problem;target setting;core principle;institutional design;public policy;diagnostic focus;public contract;organizational learning;reform design;interest group;external influence;reform process;reform effort;marginal impact;quality teaching;political authority;Institutional Sustainability;empirical findings;productive infrastructure;reformed system;capital asset;performance data;comparative data;Tax Administration;reform strategy;Infant Mortality;fiscal reporting;market practice;tax policy;public security;budget classification;state modernization;compensation policy;recruitment policy;Wage Bill;cash balance;payroll control;salary payment;extensive use;fiscal information;skilled personnel;qualified personnel;improving performance;educational qualification;program budget;professional education;political stake;improved delivery;promotion policy;traditional use;budgetary procedure;short supply;staff management;remuneration norm;accountability framework;Performance Appraisals;management regimes;relative performance;informed choice;political attention;performance successes;learning capacity;

تنزيل الملفات

تقرير كامل

نسخة رسمية من الوثيقة (قد تضم توقيعات، الخ)