Authors of benefit-incidence analyses (BIA) have to impute subsidies using assumptions about the relationship between unobserved subsidies “captured” by the household and what can be observed at the household and aggregate levels. This paper shows that one of the two assumptions used in BIA studies to date will necessarily produce a more pro-rich (or less pro-poor) picture of government health spending than the other, depending on whether utilization...
انظر المزيد
تفاصيل
-
2011/1/01
-
مقال بمجلة علمية
-
104034
-
1
-
1
-
2016/3/17
-
Disclosed
-
Benefit incidence analysis are government health expenditures : more pro-rich than we think?
-
concentration index
تنزيل الملفات
تقرير كامل
نسخة رسمية من الوثيقة (قد تضم توقيعات، الخ)
-
Total Downloads** : 297