Skip to Main Navigation

Poverty reduction strategy papers and IDA13 (الإنجليزية)

The Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) approach is designed to serve several objectives. First, it will constitute a mechanism to link the use of debt relief under the Enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative to public actions to reduce poverty. Second, it will increase the focus of all Bank and Fund concessional assistance to low-income countries on the overarching objective of poverty reduction. Third, it will help improve the effectiveness of concessional assistance through application of the principles of the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF) -- country-ownership, a long-term, holistic perspective of development challenges, partnerships, and results orientation. And fourth, it will provide a framework not only for improved Bank-Fund collaboration but also for improved aid coordination among all donors, including collaborative efforts to achieve the International Development Goals (IDGs). The early experience with the PRSP approach suggests that it holds considerable promise for improving the effectiveness of development assistance for reducing poverty in low-income countries.

تفاصيل

  • تاريخ الوثيقة

    2001/05/01

  • نوع الوثيقة

    تقرير مجلس المديرين التنفيذيين

  • رقم التقرير

    26484

  • مجلد رقم

    1

  • عدد المجلدات

    1

  • البلد

    العالم,

  • المنطقة

    مناطق العالم,

  • تاريخ الإفصاح

    2010/07/01

  • اسم الوثيقة

    Poverty reduction strategy papers and IDA13

  • كلمة أساسية

    interim poverty reduction strategy;Governance and Public Sector Management;Country Policy and Institutional Assessment;economic and sector work;national poverty reduction strategy;objective of poverty reduction;monitoring and evaluation system;social impact of policy;program for poverty reduction;data collection and analysis;regional multilateral development bank;public expenditure program;public action;dimensions of poverty;international development goal;Public Expenditure Management;international donor community;natural resource degradation;international good practice;indicators of progress;labor market regulation;division of labor;social and environmental;reducing maternal mortality;Private Sector Growth;improvement in governance;Country Assistance Strategies;capacity of country;Social Impact Analysis;country assistance strategy;social sector investment;high growth rate;poverty reduction target;poverty reduction goal;quality of data;long-term debt sustainability;civil service performance;social sector policy;civil society group;determinants of poverty;accessibility of data;poverty reduction outcome;constraints on implementation;social and institutional;analysis of gender;evolution over time;allocation of expenditure;long-term poverty reduction;poverty reduction objective;Social Safety Nets;financial sector development;public sector budget;access to financing;economic sector work;public financial accountability;Financial Management System;program of support;development partner;concessional assistance;Learning and Innovation Credit;business model;debt relief;blend country;macroeconomic framework;adjustment lending;Macroeconomic Policy;external partner;lending scenario;poverty diagnostic;poverty datum;institutional constraint;external assistance;small states;environmental sustainability;procurement system;capacity constraint;fiscal choice;public dialogue;exogenous shock;social inclusion;reference material;operational issues;Public Spending;governance issue;quantitative targets;fiduciary assessment;social condition;factor market;social reform;Budget Management;subsequent years;social group;common purpose;property right;fiscal resource;budget formulation;allocation system;sectoral analysis;business strategy;development vision;diagnostic analysis;external trade;investment expenditure;significant attention;Domestic NGO;budget allocation;donor assistance;budgetary framework;budget datum;budgetary cycle;contingency plan;equitable treatment;development policy;domestic price;Trade Policies;Trade Policy;aid resource;social grouping;institutional weakness;Public Services;short-term measures;poverty monitoring;external financing;domestic borrowing;Financing plans;institutional policy;budget priority;fighting poverty;medium-term development;external stakeholder;bilateral agency;poverty issue;fiduciary framework;political structure;millennium summit;diagnostic work;budgetary resource;poverty focus;national strategy;advocate policy;policy option;political will;vulnerable group;commercial interests;active participation;Judicial Reform;police system;participatory exercise;accurate reflection;Borrowing Countries;comprehensive view;political institution;public debate;public budget;consultation process;fiduciary arrangement;broad consultation;financial flow;gender dimension;fiscal stance;administrative budget;external position;quantitative assessment;policy formulation;participatory method;nonlending service;qualitative goals;domestic revenue;comparative advantage;public policy;sector programs;external support;government leadership;national interest;primary vehicles;allocation process;collaborative effort;sector-wide approaches;road map;Political Systems;poverty determinant;customs policy;fiscal transparency;government conduct;stakeholder involvement;Ethnic Minorities;research institute;governance reform;fiscal management;broad participation;domestic stakeholders;qualitative information;long-term perspective;quantitative data;trade union

تنزيل الملفات

تقرير كامل

نسخة رسمية من الوثيقة (قد تضم توقيعات، الخ)